In a format similar to popular American show `Judge Judy', small claims cases are adjudicated in a studio courtroom presided over by criminal law barrister Rob Rinder. Each programme sees three different cases brought before the judge, who questions claimants and defendants, speaks to witnesses, assess the evidence and makes judgements. He also reserves the right to throw the case, and the people, out of his court! Called in 2001, Rinder at his legal practice focuses on international fraud, money laundering, and other forms of financial crime, a long gavel throw away from the cases he judges on TV.
Patricia V Nellie: Patricia is in court to claim back 5000 pounds for loans she made to her sister to help pay for a new car and a deposit on a property. (S3, ep 7)
Deborah V Neil: Deborah is in court to claim 825 pounds to correct repairs made to her garden wall by her neighbour. (S3, ep 8)
Atul V Terry: Atul is claiming £300 he paid for a role in a film which hasn't been made. Defendant Terry says the film is still in pre-production and will eventually be made. (S3, ep 12)
June V Alan: Judge Rinder presides over two cases involving loans that the defendants believed were gifts. (S3, ep 9)
Romeo V Tarek: A brother loaned money to another brother who maintains that, since it's a family matter, it shouldn't have to be repaid. Judge Rinder presides. (S3, ep 10)
Natalie V Jane: Judge Rinder presides over a case concerning damages for loss of business and defamation. (S3, ep 11)
Tarjih V Nathaniel: Judge Rinder presides over a case concerning money owed to models used on a video shoot. (S3, ep 13)
Ron V Cristina: Man claims his ex-partner defaulted on a loan he signed as guarantor and two brothers argue over the sale of a mobile phone. (S3, ep 14)
Evett V Sophia: Mother and daughter argue over payments for a set of pots and a man wants money back for a faulty moped but the seller says it was fine when she sold it to him. (S3, ep 15)
Sue V Elle: Judge Rinder listens to grievances and disputes and tries to resolve the matters in an idealistic and impartial manner. (S3, ep 16)
Sharon V Matt: Judge Rinder listens to grievances and disputes and tries to resolve the matters in an idealistic and impartial manner. (S3, ep 17)
Ian V Steve: Judge Rinder listens to grievances and disputes and tries to resolve the matters in an idealistic and impartial manner. (S3, ep 18)
Terry V Tony: Judge Rinder listens to grievances and disputes and tries to resolve the matters in an idealistic and impartial manner. (S3, ep 19)
Angelica V Ashleigh: Judge Rinder listens to grievances and disputes and tries to resolve the matters in an idealistic and impartial manner. (S3, ep 20)
Brun V Tony: Judge Rinder listens to grievances and disputes and tries to resolve the matters in an idealistic and impartial manner. (S3, ep 21)
Nes & Gavin V St. John: Judge Rinder listens to grievances and disputes and tries to resolve the matters in an idealistic and impartial manner. (S3, ep 22)
Julia V Francis: Judge Rinder listens to grievances and disputes and tries to resolve the matters in an idealistic and impartial manner. (S3, ep 23)
Maria V Pete: Judge Rinder listens to grievances and disputes and tries to resolve the matters in an idealistic and impartial manner. (S3, ep 24)
Judy V Matthew: Judge Rinder listens to grievances and disputes and tries to resolve the matters in an idealistic and impartial manner. (S3, ep 25)
Jack V Niko: Judge Rinder listens to grievances and disputes and tries to resolve the matters in an idealistic and impartial manner. (S3, ep 26)
Linda V Jess: Judge Rinder listens to grievances and disputes and tries to resolve the matters in an idealistic and impartial manner. (S3, ep 27)